Meet the faculty candidate poster session 2012 dodge

Diversity statements from faculty candidates are an unfair test of ideology? | Drugmonkey

The "Meet-the-Faculty Candidate" poster session will provide a great opportunity for faculty, recruiters, and Department Chairs to speak directly with current. New Research Poster Sessions are NOT designated for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Scientific sessions are open to all Annual Meeting. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (‐) and the President of the . The "Meet the Faculty Candidate" poster session provides a great opportunity for faculty, search Authors: Junjie Qin, Insoon Yang and Ram Rajagopal.

You could also emphasize if a paper is in a famous journal, or has received a lot of citations. Likewise, could list your role in writing the proposal, and how much money it received. Basically, when I look at resume's, I am trying to extract, as fast as i can, your top achievements, such that I can put you into a comparison table against other candidates.

Time spent on each resume is probably under 30 seconds, so if you don't emphasize things the reviewer may miss them. Some common resume mistakes: The max should be pages, but even 2 is acceptable in fact the NSF biosketch is limited to 2pgs.

ASDA's first ever Poster Session

There is a tendency to describe in gory detail everything you every did in your past I just saw one 28 pgs long Another example is an applicant put his GPA for every degree This goes along with the previous criticisms.

For example, if you have an 8 page resume, full of conference proceedings, and you put your publications at the very end So are your proposal writing experience, your patents, then followed by maybe your awards and teaching experience. I would say that proposal writing experience is the most important, and publications is second to it.

Your knitting club membership can go at the bottom The only thing better than proposal-writing experience, is funded proposals that you can bring with you. Even if you did not write the proposal, but simply helped, you should still mention it. Explain clearly what your role was in writing, which agency it was submitted to, for what amount, and was it funded or not in the end or is it still pending.

How to Get a Professor Job in the USA

So I nearly miss them. If you have something that makes you stand out, do yourself a favor and highlight so the reviewers don't miss it! Likewise, somebody had a Nature publication that wasn't emphasized Remember, we scan the resume FAST ; and we don't read minds. So you have to make important things catch our attention! On one resume I saw someone put the paper numbers on the left, and the impact factor on the right hand side of each publication.

I thought that was pretty nifty. Some people manage to squeeze the covers of the journals, if their publication made the cover. I think thats great, if you can format everything neatly. Also, make your last name bold, so we can see whether you were first or not. This makes things much easier for me. I wouldn't bother putting these in, but if you feel the need to, be a good sport and make a separate section. Don't try to pad overall list using these. It is misleading on your part, and annoying for me to subtract them out.

We care to see just what has been published or accepted. And, in any case, its not so much about the number of publications. But this is not so. In fact, more postdocs makes you look less desirable. Your goal is to sell your "stock" at the peak of its price around the 3rd or 4th year of your 1st postdoc. So a common mistake I see people doing is putting the brief postdoc immediately after their graduation on their resume.

You know, the one where your PhD boss kept you there an extra months while you were looking for a job, just cuz he is nice like that and also wanted to get more results out of you?

The committee wants to see your potential to bring in money. Therefore, in your research plan you should be trying to convince them that: The short term ideas should be almost ready to go out to the grant-funding agency i.

CSE Alumni News

You don't have to get into the gory details, since the reader is most likely not in your field, and is just trying to get an idea for what to expect from you. You could also mention potential collaborations within the department, or within the university to which you are applying another place for this is the cover letter. Keep in mind that the initial scan of your research plan is only going to take 30 seconds or so! Some common research statement mistakes I see over and over the less you annoy the reviewer, the better your chances: That's great, but I want to know whether you can function with the umbilical cord cut.

But rather you should first establish importance e. Obviously, I am exaggerating, but you get the idea. Section titles should be descriptive too.

Often I read a proposal and, by the of it, i still have no idea why or what they are trying to do. It is up to you to establish importance, and to make your work easy to understand. Some people just kind of tell me that they plan to rid the world of cancer, but don't tell me HOW they are planning to do that exactly No, you are not a snake-oil salesman, so avoid sounding like one. Such data exists in many places.

You say people are not being scientists, but the fact of the matter is that there is a lot of data on the importance of inclusiveness and diversity on successful scientific progress. There is a lot of data that decisions about what questions get asked and what gets studied changes dramatically based on who is asking those questions.

There are many examples of women's health or differences based on demographics or sociological questions that were not asked until groups with some experience that these were interesting and important questions showed up to the table to say "let's look over here too". There is lots of data that scientists being human ask the questions that interest them, which relates to their lives, which means that their experiences matter.

And therefore that having a diversity of backgrounds means that the set of questions asked changes based on who is at the table. It takes creativity and insight to identify new potential answers. Yes, one then goes and tests to see if your new idea is the right answer or not, but there is a first "I wonder if It is well established that having a diversity of backgrounds increases the set of potential answers that one can find.

That is why a group with a new "toolbox" can come into a field and answer a lot of open questions. There is a lot of data that this works for both diversity in scientific background bring together pharmacology experts, computational experts, neurophysiology experts, sociology experts, etc, and you'll do better than group-think from one group and ALSO for diversity in experiential background having women and men in the group, having a diversity of race and gender experiences in the group.

So, following those two points, diversity helps us identify new scientific questions and new potential answers for us to aim our scientific process at. Yes, science in the end is objective, but how we get there depends on our humanity, which depends on diversity. What makes humanity special is that we are not living in a zero-sum game. Heck, that's one reason why the allies won WWII and why the American's won the Cold War - because we believed in diversity and a lot of really important scientists of diversity switched sides, and a lot of those scientists of diversity had ideas that others had not thought of that ended up making a difference in the war.

Furthermore, I have now served as a faculty member for nearly two decades and have served on numerous hiring committees and on both NRSA and K99 study sections approximately 10 years worth of time on those. The idea that this diversity push is identifying weaker candidates is simply wrong.